![]() ![]() I have an i7 920 overclocked to 3.66 ghz and a 4800 HD ATI video card, and I'm still in single digits in the clouds - and that is with the settings at just two cloud layers and using the least resource intensive clouds. ASA can deliver stunning visuals - just be warned though that it delivers a huge hit performance. Am getting 20-30 fps in most settings, depending on choice of aircraft, with frames locked via FPS limiter.Specs below so you can judge for yourself.Hope this helps.Alan. If I run autogen at Dense, and scenery complexity at Very Dense, everything runs well. I use the REX 2.0 1024 clouds (they work well, and to my eye, the larger textures look over-detailed). My solution has been to run ASA pretty much at its default settings (five cloud layers), with direct wind control and direct visibility smoothing checked (these work together to eliminate abrupt transitions). But the results are so good that I don't want to do without them. Active Sky Advanced does what you need extremely well - the handling of haze and low-level clouds is outstanding.Because low-level clouds are thicker (haze is handled as a cloud layer), performance can be slightly challenging, even on a fast i7 system, especially if you use large cloud textures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |